Skip to content

To report a serious incident to DSD, as required by Section 85(2) of the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 2000, licensees should phone the serious incident report no: (08) 8463 6666.

204224-021_Pedrika_BasinPedrika Basin location map


The Pedrika Basin is a Permo-Carboniferous basin.

It is an intracratonic basin unconformably overlying the SE Amadeus Basin and western Warburton Basin which were deformed during the Alice Springs and possibly Delamerian Orogenies.

Summary

AgePermo-Carboniferous
Area in South Australia27 000 km2 (10 420 sq miles)
Depth to target zone600 - >2000m
ThicknessUp to 1500m
Hydrocarbon showsMinor fluorescence, trace gas
First commercial discoveryNone
Identified reservesNil
Undiscovered resources (50%)Not determined
ProductionNil
Basin typeIntracratonic
Depositional settingNon-marine
ReservoirsNon marine sandstone
Regional structureFaulted anticlines
SealsNon-marine shale, siltstone
Source rocksNon-marine shale, coal
Number of wells10

Seismic line km

5922 2D

Figures

The following information is available for individual download or as one document (see images below).

Download Pedirka Basin figures as one document.

The Pedirka Basin has an area of 150 000 km2, approximately one fifth of which is in South Australia and the remainder in the Northern Territory, possibly extending from there into Queensland. It is an intracratonic basin unconformably overlying the SE Amadeus Basin and western Warburton Basin which were deformed during the Alice Springs and possibly Delamerian Orogenies.

A final NW–SE compressional phase of the Alice Springs Orogeny in the Mid to Late Carboniferous initiated deposition in the Pedirka Basin and created thrust faults such as occur at Mt Hammersley. Permo-Carboniferous sediments were subsequently deposited in a tectonically quiescent sag phase. In South Australia the Permian is entirely overlain by up to 2500 m of Triassic to Late Cretaceous sediments of the Simpson and Eromanga basins.

NNE-striking high-angle reverse faults separate NNW to NNE-trending anticlinal complexes. The most prominent is the Dalhousie–McDills Ridge separating the Pedirka Basin into a western and eastern portion. Thin Permo-Carboniferous sediments are preserved across the ridge linking the two depocentres. The thickest sediments estimated from seismic interpretation (1525 m), are preserved in the Eringa Trough. Mt Hammersley 1, drilled in 1987 on the eastern flank of the trough, intersected 990 m of Permo-Carboniferous strata. Maximum thickness on the eastern side is ~550 m near Mokari 1.

The sediments were subsequently uplifted and eroded during two major compressional episodes during the late Early to Late Permian and during the Tertiary.

See Pedirka Basin figures 1, 2 and 3

Petroleum exploration in the Pedirka Basin was initiated in 1959 when Delhi and Santos were granted OELs 20 and 21. The Pedirka area was farmed out to the French Petroleum Company (later Total Exploration) and exploration during the first half of the 1960s included gravity, magnetic and seismic surveys and four wildcat wells.
A second round of activity occurred from 1969–79, when five seismic surveys were carried out and one well was drilled. In 1977 there was a non-commercial flow of oil from basal Jurassic and Triassic sediments in Poolowanna 1, located in the adjacent Simpson Basin. Exploration activity intensified in the 1980s in response to the Poolowanna discovery. Six seismic surveys were carried out and five wells were drilled, three in 1985 and two in 1988.
Seismic reinterpretation by Santos indicated that five of the previously drilled wells were not valid structural tests being outside closure at all objectives. Of the 1985 wells, Oolarinna 1 had no independent fault closure and Glen Joyce 1 had little closure.

The Pedirka Basin is currently covered by seven PEL applications and PEL 288.

Two Permo-Carboniferous formations are present in the subsurface and crop out on the basin margin in the Northern Territory. The lowermost unit (Crown Point Formation) consists of fluvioglacial and glaciolacustrine sediments. The overlying Purni Formation was deposited in a floodplain environment containing meandering river systems and extensive swamps in which coal developed.

Three facies suites are distinguishable on the basis of relative proportions of sandstone, shale and coal. Equivalents of the Stuart Range and Mt Toondina formations of the Arckaringa Basin are interpreted in Mt Hammersley 1.

The Purni Formation contains extensive coal-rich organic shale which appears to be both oil and gas-prone. It contains up to 4% dispersed organic matter, with vitrinite and exinite macerals present in moderate abundance. Data from Dalmatia 1 and Mt Hammersley 1 indicate poor to good source potential for oil in the Purni Formation.

In many areas geothermal gradients are too low for the sediments to have generated significant quantities of hydrocarbons. In South Australia thermal maturity appears to increase from west to east with VR approaching 0.9% maximum, equivalent to peak oil generation.

Crown Point shale is organically lean, average TOC ~0.2%. There is potential for richer source rocks if lacustrine facies are developed in deeper parts of the thick Eringa Trough section.
Sandstones of excellent reservoir quality are locally developed in both the Crown Point and Purni formations. Channel belt and point bar sands of the Purni Formation middle member have porosities from 6–12% and fair to good permeability.
Reservoir quality in the Crown Point Formation is best in the west with porosities up to 20–25% and permeabilities ranging from 300–2000 mD. Seismic data indicate a deepening and thickening of this reservoir facies well into the Eringa Trough. Reservoir quality deteriorates to the east; the best sand is found on structural highs in the glacial outwash deposits which commonly occur at the top of the formation.
Intraformational seals occur in both formations, and Triassic and Jurassic rocks provide a regional seal over the eastern part of the basin.

Early to mid Tertiary compressive deformation reactivated older structures and formed anticlines and faulted anticlinal traps. Other potential plays are onlap, unconformity and pinchout traps.

There is no estimate of undiscovered resources.

There are no current projects.

The WitjiraNational Park overlies the western PedirkaBasin(South Australia Reserved Land figure). Exploration is permitted.

Licence activity in the previous year is detailed in the ‘Exploration and development’ section of this USB, and Figure 5 shows the licence status at the time of publication. Use this link for further information on holders of petroleum tenements in South Australia.

Alexander EM, Pegum D, Tingate P, Staples CJ, Michaelsen BH and McKirdy DM, 1996. Petroleum potential of the Eringa Trough in South Australia and the Northern Territory. APEA Journal, 36(1):322-349.
Ambrose GJ, Liu K, Deighton I, Eadington PJ and Boreham CJ, 2002. New petroleum models in the Pedirka Basin, Northern Territory, Australia. APPEA Journal, 42(1):259-286.
Cotton TB, Scardigno, MF and Hibburt JE eds, 2006. The petroleum geology of South Australia. Vol. 2: Eromanga Basin. 2nd edn. South Australia. Department of Primary Industries and Resources. Petroleum Geology of South Australia Series.
Giuliano MF, 1988. The geology and hydrocarbon potential of the Pedirka Basin. University of Adelaide. National Centre for Petroleum Geology and Geophysics. BSc (Hons) thesis (unpublished).
Questa Australia Pty Ltd, 1990. Petroleum basin study. Eromanga Basin. Prepared by Questa Australia Pty Ltd for the Northern Territory Geological Survey. Northern Territory. Government Printer.
Youngs BC, 1976. The geology and hydrocarbon potential of the Pedirka Basin. South Australia. Geological Survey. Report of Investigations, 44.

For more information, contact:

Tony Hill
Principal Geologist
Energy Resources Division

+61 8 8463 3225
tony.hill@sa.gov.au